|
مقاله
|
Abstract
|
|
|
Title:
|
Comparison of the efficacy and ocular surface toxicity between a preservative- free methylprednisolone topical preparation and preserved prednisolone eyedrops in the treatment of acute anterior uveitis
|
Author(s):
|
A.Hedayatfar MD, H.Hashemi MD, S.Asghari Ms, SP Chee FRCS(G) , FRCOphth
|
Presentation Type:
|
Oral
|
Subject:
|
Cornea and Anterior Segment
|
Others:
|
|
Presenting Author:
|
|
Name:
|
Alireza Hedayatfar
|
Affiliation :(optional)
|
Noor Ophthalmic Research Center
|
E mail:
|
alireza28@yahoo.com
|
Phone:
|
021-82400
|
Mobile:
|
09126064677
|
|
|
Purpose:
|
To compare the anti-inflammatory effect and ocular surface toxicity of nonpreserved methylprednisolone sodium succinate 1% and preserved prednisolone acetate suspension 1% eyedrops for management of acute anterior uveitis (AAU).
|
Methods:
|
Patients with non-infectious AAU were assigned randomly to receive either hourly nonpreserved methylprednisolone 1% (Group A) or preserved prednisolone 1% (Pred Forte 1%, Allergan, Inc) eye drops (Group B) followed by a 2-week tapering regimen. Anterior chamber cells and flare were clinically evaluated for objective comparison of the anti-inflammatory effect. The main outcome measure was percent of patients with resolution of inflammation (anterior chamber cell < 1+ according to SUN classification group) on day 14. Ocular surface toxicity was assessed by objective ratings of corneal epitheliopathy (corneal fluorescein staining scores) and tear film stability indices (tear break-up time, and Schirmer I test), as well as questionaire-based grading of ocular discomfort parameters. Intraocular pressure measurement served as an index of safety.
|
Results:
|
Seventy two eyes of 68 patients were studied, of which 38 eyes were enrolled in Group A and 34 in Group B. On day 14, 76.3% of Group A patients had resolution of inflammation compared with 70.6% of Group B, proving noninferiority (X2 = 0.303, P=0.582). Mean anterior chamber cell grade reduction for Group A patients was similar to Group B patients (2.52 vs. 2.86, respectively; P=0.92). The anti inflammatory efficacy as measured by reduction of anterior chamber flare was also comparable between two groups (188.4 vs. 240.1 in Group A and B, respectively; P=0.141). 18.4% of patients in the Group A compared to 17.6% of patients in Group B were withdrawn because they were assessed to be “refractory to topical treatment” (X2 = 0.007, P=0.932). Group A patients showed significantly lower corneal fluorescein staining scores (P<0.001) and reported milder subjective ocular discomfort (P = 0.01) as compared with Group B.
|
Conclusion:
|
: Both nonpreserved methylprednisolone sodium succinate 1% and preserved prednisolone acetate suspension 1% eyedrops demonstrated equal anti-inflammatory effect for treatment of AAU. Nonpreserved methylprednisolone eyedrops exhibited significantly lower ocular surface toxicity profile and milder subjective discomfort when compared with preserved eyedrops.
|
Attachment:
|
|
|