image 2 image 4
Skip Navigation Links
 Home 
 Congress Structure 
 Important Dates 
 Venue 
 Pre Registered 
 Hotel Info 
 Abstracts 
 Scientific Program 
 Social Program 
 Exhibition 
 Contact Us 
 Archive 
       XXIII Annual Congress of the Iranian Society of Ophthalmology        بـیــست و سومین کنــگــره سـالیـانه انـجـمـن چـشـم پـزشـکی ایـــران
مقاله Abstract


Title: Comparison of the efficacy and ocular surface toxicity between a preservative- free methylprednisolone topical preparation and preserved prednisolone eyedrops in the treatment of acute anterior uveitis
Author(s): A.Hedayatfar MD, H.Hashemi MD, S.Asghari Ms, SP Chee FRCS(G) , FRCOphth
Presentation Type: Oral
Subject: Cornea and Anterior Segment
Others:
Presenting Author:
Name: Alireza Hedayatfar
Affiliation :(optional) Noor Ophthalmic Research Center
E mail: alireza28@yahoo.com
Phone: 021-82400
Mobile: 09126064677
Purpose:

To compare the anti-inflammatory effect and ocular surface toxicity of nonpreserved methylprednisolone sodium succinate 1% and preserved prednisolone acetate suspension 1% eyedrops for management of acute anterior uveitis (AAU).

Methods:

Patients with non-infectious AAU were assigned randomly to receive either hourly nonpreserved methylprednisolone 1% (Group A) or preserved prednisolone 1% (Pred Forte 1%, Allergan, Inc) eye drops (Group B) followed by a 2-week tapering regimen. Anterior chamber cells and flare were clinically evaluated for objective comparison of the anti-inflammatory effect. The main outcome measure was percent of patients with resolution of inflammation (anterior chamber cell < 1+ according to SUN classification group) on day 14. Ocular surface toxicity was assessed by objective ratings of corneal epitheliopathy (corneal fluorescein staining scores) and tear film stability indices (tear break-up time, and Schirmer I test), as well as questionaire-based grading of ocular discomfort parameters. Intraocular pressure measurement served as an index of safety.

Results:

Seventy two eyes of 68 patients were studied, of which 38 eyes were enrolled in Group A and 34 in Group B. On day 14, 76.3% of Group A patients had resolution of inflammation compared with 70.6% of Group B, proving noninferiority (X2 = 0.303, P=0.582). Mean anterior chamber cell grade reduction for Group A patients was similar to Group B patients (2.52 vs. 2.86, respectively; P=0.92). The anti inflammatory efficacy as measured by reduction of anterior chamber flare was also comparable between two groups (188.4 vs. 240.1 in Group A and B, respectively; P=0.141). 18.4% of patients in the Group A compared to 17.6% of patients in Group B were withdrawn because they were assessed to be “refractory to topical treatment” (X2 = 0.007, P=0.932). Group A patients showed significantly lower corneal fluorescein staining scores (P<0.001) and reported milder subjective ocular discomfort (P = 0.01) as compared with Group B.

Conclusion:

: Both nonpreserved methylprednisolone sodium succinate 1% and preserved prednisolone acetate suspension 1% eyedrops demonstrated equal anti-inflammatory effect for treatment of AAU. Nonpreserved methylprednisolone eyedrops exhibited significantly lower ocular surface toxicity profile and milder subjective discomfort when compared with preserved eyedrops.

Attachment:





Skip Navigation Links
        صفحه اصلی
        ساختار کنگره
        تاریخ های مهم
        مکان برگزاری
        ثبت نام شدگان
        اطلاعات هتل - رزرو
        ارسال مقالات
        برنامه کنگره
        برنامه های جانبی
        نمایشگاه
        تماس با ما
        آرشیو کنگره سالهای گذشته
        جستجوی سخنران
 
Last News

  - بـیــست و سومین کنــگــره سـالیـانه انـجـمـن چـشـم پـزشـکی ایـــران