|
مقاله
|
Abstract
|
|
|
|
Title:
|
Comparison of the Visual outcomes between PRK-MMC and Artiflex Phakic IOL Implantation in High Myopic Patients
|
|
Author(s):
|
Hassan Hashemi, Mohammad Miraftab, Soheila Asgari
|
|
Presentation Type:
|
Oral
|
|
Subject:
|
Cornea and Anterior Segment
|
|
Others:
|
|
|
Presenting Author:
|
|
|
Name:
|
Seyed mohammad Miraftab
|
|
Affiliation :(optional)
|
Noor ophthalmology research center, Noor Eye Hospital, Tehran, Iran
|
|
E mail:
|
mmiraftab@norc.ac.ir
|
|
Phone:
|
22419786
|
|
Mobile:
|
09121576075
|
|
|
|
|
Purpose:
|
to compare the one-year results of visual outcomes between PRK-MMC and Phakic IOL implantation in patients with more than 8D of myopia.
|
|
Methods:
|
This non-randomized clinical trial was performed on 23 eyes under treatment with Artiflex phakic IOL (Group A) and 23 eyes under treatment with PRK-MMC (Group B).
|
|
Results:
|
The safety index was 1.11±0.23 and 1.05±0.25 (P=0.100) and the efficacy index was 1.02± 0.11 and 0.98± 0.10(P=0.266) in group A and B, respectively. One year after the surgery, the MRSE was -0.17±1.18 and -0.25±0.18 D in group A and B, respectively (P=0.471). Mesopic CS showed no significant difference between the two groups in any spatial frequency. Total coma was0.24±0.17 and 0.67±0.40 µm (P<0.001), spherical aberration was -0.11±0.11 and 0.41±0.18 µm (P<0.001), and RMS HOAT was 0.50±0.20 and 0.96±0.45 µm (P<0.001) in group A and B, respectively.
|
|
Conclusion:
|
According to the one-year results of our study, Artiflex phakic IOL Implementation was better than PRK-MMC in the correction of high myopia in terms of visual quality but two methods had no difference in regards to visual acuity. Therefore, PRK-MMC can be used with acceptable results when the anterior chamber depth is a limiting factor in the implementation of phakic IOLs.
|
|
Attachment:
|
|
|